The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Use and strengthen stakeholder networks and relationships
|
|
Formal and informal networks with service providers and vulnerable groups are used to support ongoing and future recovery planning for vulnerable populations Completed |
Evidence:
|
Relationships across sectors are strengthened through shared expertise, information and resources to improve recovery services and support to vulnerable groups |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Peak bodies and non-government sector are involved in cross-sector, interagency emergency management and recovery planning activities in support of vulnerable populations |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Isolated, vulnerable and marginalised groups are identified through existing networks, and documented according to organisational policies and procedures |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Communicate and interact with key stakeholders
|
|
Communication strategies to facilitate information sharing between communities, vulnerable populations and other relevant stakeholders is identified and documented according to organisational policies and procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Consultation strategies that uphold the right to respect, dignity and provision of honest and transparent information is developed, documented and shared with stakeholders |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Pre-existing marginalisation that leads to disproportionate impacts on vulnerable groups is shared with planning stakeholders |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Cultural protocols and considerations are used to inform emergency and recovery planning |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Person-centred and capability approaches to resilience building is explained to recovery planners and practitioners to be incorporated into their work |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contribute to recovery planning context and framework
|
|
Legislative, regulatory and organisational requirements, policy, procedures, existing arrangements and plans impacting on the recovery planning framework are identified, analysed and shared Completed |
Evidence:
|
Compatibility, links and interactions between emergency management plans and recovery policies and principles are researched and shared in a timely fashion |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Support gaps are identified and documented to improve efficiency and effectiveness of emergency planning for vulnerable populations |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Affected vulnerable and marginalised communities and individuals are enabled to identify and communicate their priorities and needs |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Existing strengths and capacities of vulnerable populations are identified and documented |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Inclusive practices are identified and applied in the design and delivery of recovery programs and activities |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Existing resources that support a place-based, person-centred and community-led approach are identified and documented accurately |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Collaborate on reducing risks
|
|
Key stakeholders are engaged across sectors and communities to identify risks to vulnerable populations Completed |
Evidence:
|
Vulnerable populations' susceptibility and resilience to risks are incorporated into preparedness activities |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Ongoing collaboration between peak bodies and recovery practitioners is conducted to identify recovery outcomes and/or evolving needs/priorities and strengths |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Alternate sources and guidance such as the disability action plan are utilised to inform emergency and recovery planning processes |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Embed learning opportunities into ongoing practice
|
|
Monitoring and evaluation activities are conducted to capture and reflect person-centred recovery approaches and considerations to inform future recovery planning and activities Completed |
Evidence:
|
Communities are enabled to incorporate learnings into their processes for current recovery and resilience |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluation of recovery of non-government organisations and peak bodies who provide ongoing support to vulnerable people and groups is conducted to ensure person-centred considerations are embedded in leaning outcomes |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Interagency lesson management processes are contributed to and documented accurately |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|